Uber, Lyft say they will halt rides in California unless appeals court steps in – Reports

Uber, Lyft say they will halt rides in California unless appeals court steps in

OAKLAND, Calif.—Unless a state appellate court decides to intervene Thursday, Uber and Lyft say they will shut down their passenger service across California for at least several months if not more than a year.

The companies say that it is practically impossible for them to comply with a San Francisco judge’s order issued on Aug. 10 that said they had violated a new state law known as AB5 and had misclassified hundreds of thousands of their drivers as contractors rather than employees.

Judge Ethan Schulman of San Francisco County Superior Court found an “overwhelming likelihood” that both Uber and Lyft had misclassified their drivers. He imposed a preliminary injunction in People of California v. Uber and Lyft, ordering the companies to halt the practice, which saves each company millions of dollars a year because they do not have to pay into benefits, including unemployment and workers’ compensation.

The mayors of San Jose and San Diego issued a statement Wednesday, asking the First District Court of Appeal to put the injunction on hold because a shutdown would “deepen economic pain felt in our communities during this historic pandemic and recession.”

Schulman had already put enforcement of the ruling on hold for 10 days pending appeal, a time period that ends Thursday at 11:59 p.m. It remains unknown when or if the appellate court would rule before the clock expires.

Uber did not respond to NBC News’ emailed questions on Wednesday afternoon. Lyft declined to comment for attribution.

Byers Market Newsletter

Get breaking news and insider analysis on the rapidly changing world of media and technology right to your inbox.

READ  Beijing’s push for mass Covid testing in Hong Kong commits the cardinal sin of public health – Reports

Schulman’s ruling is the latest twist in the lawsuit filed three months ago by California Attorney General Xavier Becerra and city attorneys from San Francisco, Los Angeles and San Diego.

On Wednesday morning, San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo and San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer largely agreed with changes to AB5 that align with what Uber and Lyft have already proposed.

“The vast majority of drivers want to stay independent workers and are looking for solutions that protect their independence while also providing additional benefit,” they wrote.

The mayors did not mention it outright but alluded to a proposed law that will be go before California voters in November, known as Proposition 22. It would grant a vast exemption to AB5 for Uber, Lyft and other similar gig economy companies, including DoorDash. The three companies have contributed the overwhelming majority of funding for the largest lobbying group behind Proposition 22.

Uber has used the threat of pulling out of a geographic area before as a way to pressure politicians not bending to its will. In May 2017, the companies restored service in Austin, Texas, after being absent from the capital city for over a year.

The dispute centered around whether a city could impose extra requirements, such as fingerprinting and background checks, above and beyond what the state mandated. When the state Legislature passed a law establishing that municipalities could not do so, it paved the way for Uber and Lyft to return.

READ  5 things to watch in the final week of the 2020 campaign – Thebritishjournal Reports

Since Schulman’s ruling last week, attorneys for both sides have filed dueling sets of briefs that are now before the appellate court.

As government lawyers wrote in their Wednesday filing, the ride-hailing companies have engaged in “unlawful behavior” for years. In their filings, Uber and Lyft said Schulman’s ruling requires them to “upend” their entire business model and move drivers to a less flexible working schedule.

Government lawyers claim Uber and Lyft are choosing to shut down to make vast changes to their business model, a deliberate decision the companies are making and not ordered by the court.

“They can stop the unlawful activities altogether, or they can choose to adjust their practices to comply with the law,” they wrote. “The fact that it may be difficult for Petitioners quickly to adjust their business operations does not alter the nature of the injunction requiring them to stop violating the law, nor does it allow them to profit inequitably from their unlawful status quo.”

Cyrus Farivar is a reporter on the tech investigations unit of NBC News in San Francisco.

The post Uber, Lyft say they will halt rides in California unless appeals court steps in appeared first on NBC News.

Almost all The British Journal staff, including reporters, can be contacted by e-mail. In most cases the e-mail address follows this formula: first initial + last name + @thebritishjournal.com. For example, Laura F. Nixon is [email protected]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.