Being ranked among the most park-poor cities in America is a fitness test no city wants to flunk. But in 2020 amid the pandemic, the national “ParkScore” ratings issued by The Trust for Public Land (TPL) took on greater meaning as overcrowding at home and lack of school recess put families in a bind.
The nonprofit group, which works with cities, schools and conservation agencies to preserve open space and create parks, in the past year invested $45.7 million to build new playgrounds in city parks.
But TPL is also a judge. Its influential annual ParkScore ranking showed that in 2020 cities like Scottsdale, Los Angeles and Houston were park-poor, ranking 44th, 49th and 78th among the 100 largest cities. Yet Rust Belt cities like Cincinnati, Pittsburgh and St. Louis are in the top 15 — thanks to extensive park systems. The three top-ranking cities in 2020 were Minneapolis, Washington, D.C. and St. Paul.
[Where does your city fall on the ParkScore list? Access your city’s score at this link by scrolling halfway down the page to “See All ParkScore Rankings,” then type in your city’s name.]
One ParkScore measure is whether parks are well-equipped with amenities such as playground equipment, benches, athletic fields and recreation programs. Another is how many residents live within a 10-minute walk of a city park. “One hundred million people don’t have a 10-minute walk to a park, and of that number 28 million are kids,” says Linda Hwang, director of research and innovation at TPL.
A diverse mix of cities fall at or near the bottom of the list and vividly illustrate a nationwide struggle to improve parks. The low rankings of some cities, including Lubbock, Texas, Oklahoma City, and Fresno, Stockton and Santa Ana, California, are echoes of racist municipal history, city leaders disconnected from residents, or fiscal and natural disasters.
Fresno, ranked 92nd by ParkScore, is in political turmoil over parks. From its earliest days in the 1870s, the city was highly segregated and “it is almost ingrained to have the haves and the have-nots still today,” said Sandra Celedon, president and CEO of the non-profit Fresno Building Healthy Communities
Grecia Elenes, a senior policy advocate for the non-profit Leadership Counsel in Fresno County, recalls playing at Fresno’s Hyde Park as a child: “Right next to it, you can see from the hills a meat-rendering facility with trucks with animal carcasses going in and out.”
In 2018, these and other grassroots groups passed by 52% a sales tax increase to fund parks. The City of Fresno sued, saying the tax hike needed a two-thirds vote. In mid-December, an appeals court ruled for the groups. Outgoing Fresno Mayor Lee Brand explained, “We have so many needs. One-third of Fresno is poor. I wanted a balanced measure, with public safety included,” he told FairWarning. But in a nod to the winners, Brand says he sees the good in their battle. “We’ll be able to address major restoration of our parks and create new ones. We need them.”
In Lubbock, racial disparities fueled its park-poor ranking of 93rd. Joshua Shankles, a produce farmer and board member of the Lubbock Compact, a local group working on such issues as homelessness and expanding parks, says heavy industry, waste treatment plants and “city dumping grounds” are concentrated in working-class Latino and Black Lubbock.
“We see parks as a way to attack and counterbalance this.”
Dense, land-poor Santa Ana, torn between parks and development, is in 85th place. But that rating by ParkScore may not be forever. The November 2020 election altered local politics, which could lead to unconventional parks in the nation’s fourth most-dense city, according to Santa Ana School District Board President Rigo Rodriguez.
With 12,471 people per square mile, officials say Santa Ana and its residents, 41% of whom are Latino, are paying the price of long-ago planners who gave parks short shrift. School board members and city officials are discussing using green fields on school land as semi-permanent public parks after school hours.
A tougher fight in Santa Ana is focused on the Willowick Golf Course, 102 acres of tree-studded land that has been declared surplus by its owner, the neighboring city of Garden Grove. Advocates hope to save it from development, said Cynthia Guerra, an organizer with one of the local groups trying to preserve it for a city park. “Low-income residents live next to it, and get the golf balls hit into their yards,” Guerra said, “but have never been inside because they couldn’t pay the fee.”
In Oklahoma City, ranked 97th by ParkScore, officials came out swinging—with upbeat hopes. This city made up of more than 600 neighborhoods, many highly active, is still picking up from a monster ice storm on October 27 that wiped out grand historic trees.
Brian Dougherty, director of parks for the Oklahoma City Community Foundation, a non-profit, says that because Oklahoma lets cities keep only sales tax, not property taxes, developers must build their own greenbelts. The Trust for Public Land, he said, counts scores of parks concentrated in older working-class areas, but not greenbelts in newer, outer areas.
“When the ratings come out, you’re kind of like, oh boy,” says Dougherty. “There’s always room for improvement. But if you are looking for parks within a 10-minute walk, having less density is a detriment.”
Georgie Rasco, executive director of the Neighborhood Alliance of Central Oklahoma, describes a city with deeply involved voters who approved an upgrade of existing parks, and backed the $132 million Scissortail Park that opened in 2019 downtown.
“I think I know why we can’t walk to a park in 10 minutes,” Rasco said. “For the longest time we were the most spread-out city, and we’re still very spread out. It’s not that we have less parks, but they’re spread out, too. … But so much good is happening despite that.”
Rising from bankruptcy by cutting deep, Stockton is on the mend. But it’s ranked 87th for parks. In 2020 the city won $8.5 million from the state to remake vandal-ravaged McKinley Park in South Stockton with basketball courts and a renovated pool.
But Erin Reynolds, associate program manager with the non-profit Public Health Advocates, says the city has limited park access in areas that suffered discrimination in investment and mortgage lending. “The same communities redlined years ago are the most severely disadvantaged now,” she says, primarily downtown and in South Stockton.
Stockton Public Works Director Jodi Almassy says the city is considering a plan to expand an existing park onto land that is now a defunct golf course “with beautiful oak trees close to the water,” in an underserved area of South Stockton. If Stockton pulls that off, they won’t be stuck at 87th for long.
Linda Hwang, TPL’s director of research, sees hope in such efforts, particularly in the movement to convert school grounds to parks. New York City leads with 220 schoolyards converted through joint-use agreements, often with help from TPL. “We work to convert from mostly asphalt into green — especially in these pandemic times, to have a green space, a place outdoors,” Hwang says.
TPL is working with Dallas, Oakland, Tacoma, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Newark, Camden, Atlanta and other cities to convert school yards and other land to parks. “Once we did New York,” she says, “we realized this is a really important thing.”
Which U.S. cities get failing grades on parks The British Journal Editors and Wire Services/ Salon.